Civilization at Large
Total Pageviews
Saturday, February 25, 2012
New World Matters
Now, here I am in 2012, nearly 24 years later, while watching a debate on BBC-International, there was a debate on the Greek debt crisis, as to whether Greece should leave the Euro. The crowd overwhelmingly selected the negative side, that no, it should remain within that union.
My old professor's name flashed in my mind, and I discovered a book that he had published, Melakopides, Costas. Pragmatic idealism: Canadian foreign policy, 1945-1995 (Google eBook). When I can comfortably scare up the CA$76.00, I'll have to purchase that.
In the meantime, I'll have to merely speculate, and continue to expose my "typical" and somewhat naive understanding of world affairs.
The fact that the world looks at things differently has never been so readily accessible. Recently, on my Cable-TV package, I have received access to RT (Russian Television), and AJE (Al Jazeera English). The different bias has been blatant, to say the least, but that's not to say it isn't deserved, or at least, palatable.
While back in 1988, there may have been some excuse for not being aware of points of view from all points of the world, here in 2012, that is no longer the case. However, prevailing bias of each point of view does continue to make understanding difficult.
Different viewpoints are necessary, if understanding is any kind of objective.
It is easy to become overwhelmed with the trials faced by the world's population, especially when so many media-voices are tone-deaf to one another. Trying to infer truth from the limited messages received is arduous, especially when bombarded with unrepentant propaganda.
In the coming days, I hope to share some observations that may find weight. They may end up worthless, in the end, but it will be with the effort of viewing this incomprehensible world of seven-billion-plus with understanding eyes and ears.
That course, back in 1988, was one I abandoned at the close of the first term. In the following spring, I was privileged to participate in a Model UN gathering in Regina, SK. It was an invigorating time, watching the impossible structure of improving the world's affairs. Was indeed a "consummation devoutly to be wished" in a way that there might remain hope, for a better world.
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Turning the Table on Bad Situations
In conflict, it is often wise to strip it down to more basic components. Is it "disposition" or "situation" that is the problem?
Take the Middle East for example. For the most part, neither party "cares" about the others' disposition. As far as they are concerned, the other doesn't register much at all. So, it becomes a problem of situation by default.
In Gaza, the situation is bad. In Israel, the situation is bad. The rest of the Middle East isn't too impressed with the existence of Israel at all, and so, Israel must maintain constant vigilance, lest its enemies' will be done.
So what do they do in Gaza? Hamas, likely with the backing of Iran, and other Arms-Traders, supply missiles to Gaza, to reign down on Israel.
Isn't there a definition of insanity? Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result? Or bombing Israel?
What is to be done to stop the madness? Obviously, the situations in Israel and in Gaza need to be improved. The causes for the bad situations need to be reduced, and no, that does not mean eliminating the jews, or the Palestinians for that matter.
The situations do need to be improved, but how can that be done, whilst missiles are flying and exploding in the neighbourhoods of innocents? It's true that those who launch missiles, by definition, cannot be innocent. They may be doing their job, but as in dreadful times gone by, that is not an excuse.
So clearly, those jobs must be ended. It is not practical to end those jobs by will alone. Rather, those people may still be employed as "Military" or "Militants," but their duties must be redefined.
It's true that Israelis and Palestinians are ever-fearful of the judgement that is due them. The crimes of their armed forces are heinous, and the world-at-large is cursed to have to bear their company.
That said, how do we make "Bad Situations" better?
Forgiveness is a good start. Programs to make a better situation are needed. Action to reduce causes for grievance must be implemented. Disputes must be settled, in a manner that ratchets down the sense of unfairness.
Yet, there is blood on the streets, and cries for vengeance fill the sky.
Every Arms-Trader, or Arms-Handler should be ashamed of themselves, and for good reason. They may be assuaged by the money that flows their way, being part of a caravan of destruction. They may find false justification for their evil actions, and even humility in the encouragement of their comrades and supporters, but they are wrong.
The situation is bad. It has gotten worse, and it simply must get better. Whilst we have passed through one season of "good will," the world simply cannot afford this reaction to a global economy gone haywire.
What do Arms-Traders do when the market falters? Sell more arms. There is apparently a willing market, but it must end. Those who trade must stop or be stopped. Period.
The need for vengeance must be replaced by the need for improved living situations and security of person, property, and culture. The position of faith or religion must ever be put within a private sphere that has no bearing on public affairs, save within peaceful constraints.
It is a time to bring out people's better dispositions. Those that foster diplomacy and friendship, over those that perpetuate adversity. It can be done. It must be done. It will be done. Not for the sake of a "higher power" but for the sake of all humanity.
It is far past time to take up our neighbours burdens and make them our own. It is far past the time to care, not only for ourselves, but for our neighbours, so that most of us will avoid needless destruction in these uncertain times, and awaken the better aspirations of people everywhere.